Skip to main content
Solutions/Comparison/Saas
Comparison · Website

Webflow builds marketing sites fast. Custom Next.js builds everything else.

Webflow is the right choice for marketing websites that need a design-first workflow and visual editing. Custom Next.js is the right choice when the site needs application logic, complex data, or integrations that Webflow's platform can't handle.

150+
Projects shipped
99%
Client retention
~12wk
Average delivery
The problem
Marketing site or web application that's hitting Webflow's limits — performance issues, logic limitations, or integration requirements that Webflow's CMS and JavaScript can't accommodate

Webflow sits in a sweet spot: more flexible than WordPress page builders, with a visual design workflow that produces well-structured HTML/CSS. For marketing sites managed by design and content teams without developer involvement, it's genuinely excellent.

The limitations surface predictably:

Performance. Webflow adds JavaScript runtime overhead. Complex interactions and animations add more. CWV scores for Webflow sites are typically lower than well-optimized Next.js builds. For SaaS companies where organic search matters, this gap is consequential.

Logic limitations. Webflow's logic and conditional visibility are limited. Complex dynamic content (filtered product listings, user-personalized content, data from external APIs formatted in custom ways) requires workarounds or isn't possible.

CMS limitations. Webflow CMS has item limits per plan and a data model that doesn't support complex relationships. For content types with many relationships or large datasets, the CMS model doesn't scale.

Integrations. Webflow's integration ecosystem is Zapier and Memberstack and similar tools. Deep integrations with backend systems (real-time inventory, CRM data, customer portals) require custom development that works alongside Webflow, adding complexity.

The auth gap. Webflow doesn't have built-in authentication for protected content areas. Memberstack, Outseta, and similar tools add auth — but the user records and payment data live in a separate system from the Webflow CMS.

What we build

Clear framework for when Webflow delivers the right outcome and when a custom Next.js build provides the flexibility and performance the project needs

Next.js marketing sites and applications with React, TypeScript, and Tailwind — with the performance, flexibility, and integration capabilities that Webflow can't provide.

For projects that genuinely fit Webflow (pure marketing site, design-team-managed content, no complex integrations), Webflow is the right choice. For projects that need more, custom development is the correct answer.

Engagement

One honest number to start.

Fixed-scope, fixed-price. The number below is the starting point — final scope is built from your brief.

Tier · WebsiteFixed scope
From$8,000

Clear framework for when Webflow delivers the right outcome and when a custom Next.js build provides the flexibility and performance the project needs

99% client retention across 40+ projects
Process

Three steps, every time.

The same repeatable engagement on every project. No surprises, no mystery, no billable ambiguity.

01Week 0

Brief & discovery.

We send you questions, then get on a call. Output: a written scope with every step, feature, and integration listed.

02Weeks 1–N

Build & ship.

Fixed schedule, weekly reviews. No scope creep unless you change the scope — and if you do, we reprice it transparently.

03Post-launch

Warranty & retainer.

30-day warranty on every launch. Most clients stay on a monthly retainer for ongoing features and maintenance.

Why fixed-price

Why Fixed-Price Matters Here

Webflow subscriptions ($23-$235+/month) plus add-ons accumulate over time. A custom Next.js marketing site ($8k one-time) plus hosting on Vercel ($0-$20/month) is cheaper over 2-3 years.

FAQ

Questions, answered.

Yes. Content exported from Webflow CMS can be migrated to a headless CMS (Sanity, Contentlayer). The design needs to be reimplemented. Migration is a real cost but it's feasible.

Webflow has a headless API. This pattern (Webflow as CMS, Next.js as frontend) is used by some teams — it keeps the design-team editing experience while getting Next.js's performance. A trade-off worth considering for the right team.

Webflow site (design + development): $5k-$20k + ongoing subscription. Custom Next.js site: $8k+ one-time + ~$20/month hosting. Custom development is more upfront; lower ongoing cost.

Next step

Tell Ryel about your project.

Describe what you’re building and what outcome you need. You’ll have a written, fixed-price scope within the week.