Skip to main content
Solutions/Hire/Saas
Hire · Website

Content management that editors can actually use.

A CMS is only as good as the editorial experience. Contentful and Sanity have different strengths. The wrong choice creates a CMS that developers love and editors avoid. Getting the content model right from the start prevents painful migrations.

150+
Projects shipped
99%
Client retention
~12wk
Average delivery
The problem
Need a CMS developer to set up or migrate to a headless CMS — content modeling, editor configuration, and Next.js integration

Headless CMS selection and configuration requires understanding both the editorial requirements and the technical architecture:

Contentful vs Sanity:

Contentful: strong content modeling, clear field types, strict schema. Better for structured content (product catalog, documentation). Editors have limited customization ability.

Sanity: flexible content modeling with GROQ queries, real-time collaboration, customizable Studio editor. Better for rich editorial content where the editor UX matters. Steeper initial setup.

Content modeling decisions:

Modeling a blog post seems simple but has real decisions: Is the author a reference to an Author type, or a string? Are tags a multi-select enum or references to a Tag type? These decisions affect queries and editorial workflow.

Next.js integration patterns:

  • Static generation (generateStaticParams) for blog posts: pages built at deploy time from CMS content
  • On-demand revalidation: webhook from CMS triggers ISR cache invalidation
  • Draft mode: preview unpublished content in Next.js using Sanity/Contentful preview tokens

Portable Text / Rich Text:

Sanity uses Portable Text (block-based rich text). Rendering it in Next.js requires the @portabletext/react package with custom renderers for each block type.

What we build

Headless CMS integrated with Next.js — content models, editor-friendly interface, and build/preview configuration

CMS selection

(Contentful vs Sanity for the use case)

Content models

for the content types needed

Next.js integration

with static generation and ISR

Draft preview

configuration

Editor documentation

for content team

Engagement

One honest number to start.

Fixed-scope, fixed-price. The number below is the starting point — final scope is built from your brief.

Tier · WebsiteFixed scope
From$8,000

Headless CMS integrated with Next.js — content models, editor-friendly interface, and build/preview configuration

99% client retention across 40+ projects
Process

Three steps, every time.

The same repeatable engagement on every project. No surprises, no mystery, no billable ambiguity.

01Week 0

Brief & discovery.

We send you questions, then get on a call. Output: a written scope with every step, feature, and integration listed.

02Weeks 1–N

Build & ship.

Fixed schedule, weekly reviews. No scope creep unless you change the scope — and if you do, we reprice it transparently.

03Post-launch

Warranty & retainer.

30-day warranty on every launch. Most clients stay on a monthly retainer for ongoing features and maintenance.

Why fixed-price

Why Fixed-Price Matters Here

CMS integration scope is the content types and the rendering requirements. Fixed-price.

FAQ

Questions, answered.

Yes — that's the purpose of the CMS. Setup includes editor documentation. Both Contentful and Sanity have intuitive editing interfaces once the content models are configured.

Next step

Tell Ryel about your project.

Describe what you’re building and what outcome you need. You’ll have a written, fixed-price scope within the week.