Skip to main content
Solutions/Service & Vertical/Healthtech
Service & Vertical · Web Application

Healthtech web applications need to be HIPAA-compliant before they can be used in clinical settings.

Clinical and healthcare-adjacent software has a compliance floor that consumer applications don't. HIPAA's technical safeguards aren't optional, and the vendors who process your patient data need Business Associate Agreements before a single patient record is written. We build healthtech web applications with the compliance architecture built in, not bolted on. Fixed scope, fixed price.

150+
Projects shipped
99%
Client retention
~12wk
Average delivery
The problem
You're building a healthtech product that handles protected health information and you need a developer who builds HIPAA-compliant architecture from the start, not one who promises to 'add compliance later.'

The common healthtech development failure mode: a developer builds a working web application, then the startup tries to sell to a hospital system or large provider group, and the enterprise procurement team asks for HIPAA compliance documentation. The developer wasn't building to that standard, there's no audit logging, the vendor BAAs aren't in place, and the remediation effort takes 6 months before the deal can close.

HIPAA's technical safeguards require: unique user identification (no shared login credentials); automatic logoff after inactivity (configurable, but required); audit controls that record and examine activity in systems containing PHI; data integrity controls that prevent improper alteration or destruction of PHI; and transmission security (encryption for any PHI transmitted over a network).

The vendor BAA requirement means that the choice of infrastructure vendor is a compliance decision: Vercel signs BAAs for enterprise customers, Neon signs BAAs for business customers, Clerk signs BAAs for enterprise customers. Using a vendor that won't sign a BAA for any component that touches PHI is a HIPAA violation regardless of the application-level security measures.

The FHIR standard is increasingly relevant: HL7 FHIR R4 interoperability is required for certain HHS-regulated healthcare entities, and it's increasingly required by enterprise health systems as a condition of integration. Building with a FHIR-compatible data model from the start avoids a costly migration when the first enterprise customer asks for FHIR data exchange.

What we build

A production healthtech web application with HIPAA-compliant architecture: encrypted PHI storage, audit logging of all data access, role-based access controls, secure messaging, and BAAs with every infrastructure vendor.

PHI data architecture

FHIR R4-compatible patient data model. Encryption at rest for all PHI fields (Neon's AES-256 encryption plus application-layer encryption for the most sensitive fields). Data minimisation — only the PHI fields required for the application's function, nothing more.

Audit logging infrastructure

Every read, write, update, and delete of any PHI record logged with user ID, resource type, resource ID, action, timestamp, and IP address. Audit logs stored immutably with 6-year retention. Admin audit viewer for compliance reviews and incident investigation.

Role-based access controls

Patient, provider, admin, and billing role separation with granular permissions. Providers see only their patients' records. Patients see only their own records. Access control enforced at the API layer and the database layer.

Secure messaging

In-portal messaging for provider-patient communication — no PHI in email bodies (emails contain links to the portal message). Message retention policy compliant with HIPAA's retention requirements.

BAA coordination

Vercel enterprise, Neon business, Clerk enterprise, and transactional email provider BAAs executed before any PHI is written to production systems. BAA documentation delivered as part of the project handoff.

Engagement

One honest number to start.

Fixed-scope, fixed-price. The number below is the starting point — final scope is built from your brief.

Tier · Web ApplicationFixed scope
From$25,000

A production healthtech web application with HIPAA-compliant architecture: encrypted PHI storage, audit logging of all data access, role-based access controls, secure messaging, and BAAs with every infrastructure vendor.

99% client retention across 40+ projects
Process

Three steps, every time.

The same repeatable engagement on every project. No surprises, no mystery, no billable ambiguity.

01Week 0

Brief & discovery.

We send you questions, then get on a call. Output: a written scope with every step, feature, and integration listed.

02Weeks 1–N

Build & ship.

Fixed schedule, weekly reviews. No scope creep unless you change the scope — and if you do, we reprice it transparently.

03Post-launch

Warranty & retainer.

30-day warranty on every launch. Most clients stay on a monthly retainer for ongoing features and maintenance.

Why fixed-price

Why Fixed-Price Matters Here

Healthtech founders need to know total development cost before approaching provider group customers or investors. Fixed scope, fixed price.

FAQ

Questions, answered.

Any application that creates, receives, maintains, or transmits PHI as part of a covered entity's operations or as a business associate of a covered entity requires HIPAA compliance. General wellness applications (step counters, meditation apps) that don't connect to a covered entity may not be covered. The specific determination should be made with legal counsel. When in doubt, build to HIPAA standards — it opens more doors than it closes.

HIPAA doesn't have a certification — it's a set of required safeguards. "HIPAA compliant" means implementing those safeguards. Third-party HIPAA audits (from companies like Compliancy Group or HITRUST) provide third-party attestation of compliance implementation, which some enterprise customers require. The application architecture supports those audits; conducting them is a separate engagement.

EHR integrations via FHIR APIs are possible — Epic's open.epic.com, Cerner's developer portal, and Athena's API all support FHIR R4 data exchange. The integration scope and the EHR vendor's API access requirements define the complexity.

HIPAA-compliant healthtech applications: $35k–$70k. The compliance premium reflects the audit logging infrastructure, BAA coordination, and additional security controls. Fixed-price.

Next step

Tell Ryel about your project.

Describe what you’re building and what outcome you need. You’ll have a written, fixed-price scope within the week.